Business 1800 2day Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Business 1800 2day - Essay Example This paper will also highlight the lessons learned by the furniture retailers. The paper is broken down into introduction, body, conclusions, recommendations, references and recommendations. On the other hand, consumer behavior involves one’s decisions with respect to acquirement, consumption, and disposition of activities, goods and services, experiences and ideas, and people by decision-making elements (Hoyer, and Macinnis, 2008:3). In relation to consumer behavior, decision-making involves choosing to achieve the best good, service, activity, or experiences. Bradford family really had a hard moment in terms of decision-making. They wanted to get themselves the best home, with enough accommodation for their growing family future. They were highly challenged due to lack of capital and neither of them; either the husband or the wife was able to decide the best way to work out the problem. In my opinion, I feel the only way Mr. and Mrs. Bradford was to first postpone the purcha se of the new home in order to allow accumulation of enough capital just for several months or years, then purchase all what they needed in their new home after getting enough funds with them. This decision through delaying would result to realization of more accumulated funds, enough for the said purchase. Family decision-making Family decision-making involves a series of domestic discussions at family level, to achieve common ideas that are to do with whole-family life, in contrast to ideas concerned with individual family members. These decisions normally affect several people or members of the family (Butler, Robinson, and Scanlan, 2005: 8). In our case, the Bradford’s family intents to move from a two bedroom flat that has no garden, to a three-bedroom house, which possibly has a small garden. Bradford family's planned move was because they had a son and therefore they needed more space for their growing family. This being their first time to buy a home, Bradford visited IKEA to survey what they can afford. The decision implementation needed millions of dollars to be accomplished, but the budget does not allow Mr. and Mrs. Bradford to make rental payments, purchase furniture for their new home and more, the living area for entertaining their friends (visitors). This has actually created a decision-making. In my opinion, the Bradford postponed the purchase of the new home to first accumulate money for several months or years due to shortage of capital. Taking a tour in the theoretical foundations in decision-making, there are three typical risk measures on which consequent decision-making is based on. These risk measures include; individual risk, societal risk, and specific adverse risk (Kizine, 2004: 2). Each alternative in decision-making has an array of consequences and therefore, the decision maker runs to pick the best out of the set. One of the theories of decision-making, the â€Å"Gardenfors-Sahlin’s decision-making theory† urg es that the quantity and quality of decision-makers’ information relating to possible outcomes and states of the decision situation in most cases is a vital factor when making the decision. This is because the decision situation or state has different degrees of epistemic reliability. The

Has the War on Terror made the American people more safe Research Paper

Has the War on Terror made the American people more safe - Research Paper Example The paper tells that the arguments for and against the ‘War on Terror’ has generally made the American citizens safer because 1. Apart from certain legitimacy doubts, the US military operations in Afghanistan and Iraq are credited with moving the hostilities into enemy’s territory. 2. The drone attacks used by CIA and the US military, targeting terrorist leaders, groups and safe havens, have made terrorists more anxious about their safety, rather than plotting acts of terror. 3. The elimination of key al-Qaida leaders, most notably Osama bin Laden, has allowed the US an opportunity to â€Å"disrupt, dismantle, and ultimately defeat al-Qaida†. 4. The efforts to prevent terrorists from entering the United States and operating freely inside the US borders, as well as the massive investments in aerospace control, aviation security, and screening, and maritime and border security, considerably minimized the risk of terrorist actions. 5. Community engagement agai nst Islamist-inspired radicalization and recruitment, along with information sharing among the law enforcement organizations, deprive terrorists of their financial support and raw recruits. The ‘War on Terror’ has failed to make Americans safer because 1. Many homeland security measures have been designed to deal with large threats, whereas considerably destructive terrorist acts can be perpetrated by a small group or even a single individual. 2. The terrorist targets’ selection is quite often a random process, rather than a product of grand planning, which makes efforts to determine terrorists’ intent a bit problematic. 3. Protection measures have their negative effects, including direct costs, negative economic impact, inconvenience, fear and reduction of liberties. The reasoning behind the arguments for and against There are many speculations about the real impact the US military campaigns, most notably in Afghanistan, had on terrorist networks such as al-Qaida and its affiliates and adherents, and their capabilities to target the territory of the United States. The opponents of the Bush administration’s aggressive policy aimed at disrupting and degrading al-Qaida and its affiliates argue that the use of US military overseas did very little, if anything, to protect the American people at home. Their reasoning is broadly based on the assumptions that violence, more often than not, produces violence, and that pursuing terrorists is not the armed forces’ job. To a degree or another, such reasoning may have its merits because the civil casualties alongside the civilian property and infrastructure destruction caused by the American army strikes in Afghanistan and Iraq, as well as by the CIA’s undeclared drone war in Pakistan, could be hardly justified.